"One after one, like tasting a sweet food."
This is life's "first fine rapture". It
makes him patient to
name over those myriad things (each of which seems like a
fresh discovery)
curious but potent, and above all common, that he
"loved", --
he the "Great Lover". Lover of what, then? Why,
of
"White plates and cups clean-gleaming,
Ringed with blue lines," --
and the like, through thirty lines of exquisite words;
and he is captivated
by the multiple brevity of these vignettes of sense,
keen, momentary,
ecstatic with the morning dip of youth in the wonderful
stream.
The poem is a catalogue of vital sensations and
"dear names" as well.
"All these have been my loves."
The spring of these emotions is the natural body, but
it sends pulsations
far into the spirit. The feeling rises in direct
observation,
but it is soon aware of the "outlets of the
sky".
He sees objects practically unrelated, and links them in
strings;
or he sees them pictorially; or, he sees pictures
immersed as it were
in an atmosphere of thought. When the process is
complete,
the thought suggests the picture and is its origin.
Then the Great Lover revisits the bottom of the monstrous
world,
and imaginatively and thoughtfully recreates that strange
under-sea,
whose glooms and gleams and muds are well known to him as
a strong and delighted swimmer; or, at the last, drifts
through the dream
of a South Sea lagoon, still with a philosophical
question in his mouth.
Yet one can hardly speak of "completion". These
are real first flights.
What we have in this volume is not so much a work of art
as an artist in his birth trying the wings of genius.
The poet loves his new-found element. He clings to
mortality;
to life, not thought; or, as he puts it, to the concrete,
--
let the abstract "go pack!" "There's
little comfort in the wise," he ends.
But in the unfolding of his precocious spirit, the
literary control
comes uppermost; his boat, finding its keel, swings to
the helm of mind.
How should it be otherwise for a youth well-born,
well-bred,
in college air? Intellectual primacy showed itself to him
in many wandering "loves", fine lover that he
was; but in the end
he was an intellectual lover, and the magnet seems to
have been
especially powerful in the ghosts of the men of
"wit", Donne, Marvell --
erudite lords of language, poets in another world than
ours,
a less "ample ether", a less "divine
air", our fathers thought,
but poets of "eternity". A quintessential drop
of intellect
is apt to be in poetic blood. How Platonism fascinates
the poets,
like a shining bait! Rupert Brooke will have none of it;
but at a turn of the verse he is back at it, examining,
tasting, refusing.
In those alternate drives of the thought in his South Sea
idyl
(clever as tennis play) how he slips from phenomenon to
idea and reverses,
happy with either, it seems, "were t'other dear
charmer away".
How bravely he tries to free himself from the cling of
earth,
at the close of the "Great Lover"! How little
he succeeds!
His muse knew only earthly tongues, -- so far as he
understood.
Why this persistent cling to mortality, -- with its
quick-coming cry
against death and its heaped anathemas on the
transformations of decay?
It is the old story once more: -- the vision of the first
poets,
the world that "passes away". The poetic eye of
Keats saw it, --
"Beauty that must die,
And Joy whose hand is ever at his lips
Bidding adieu."
The reflective mind of Arnold meditated it, --
"the world that seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain." --
So Rupert Brooke, --
"But the best I've known,
Stays here, and changes, breaks, grows old, is blown
About the winds of the world, and fades from brains
Of living men, and dies.
Nothing remains."
And yet, --
"Oh, never a doubt but somewhere I shall wake;"
again, --
"the light,
Returning, shall give back the golden hours,
Ocean a windless level. . . ."
again, best of all, in the last word, --
"Still may Time hold some golden space
Where I'll unpack that scented store
Of song and flower and sky and face,
And count, and touch, and turn them o'er,
Musing upon them."
He cannot forego his sensations, that "box of
compacted sweets".
He even forefeels a ghostly landscape where two shall go
wandering
through the night, "alone". So the faith that
broke its chrysalis
in the first disillusionment of boyhood, in "Second
Best",
beautiful with the burden of Greek lyricism, ends
triumphant
with the spirit still unsubdued. --
"Proud, then, clear-eyed and laughing, go to greet
Death as a friend."
So go, "with unreluctant tread". But in the
disillusionment of beauty
and of love there is an older tone. With what bitter
savor, with what
grossness of diction, caught from the Elizabethan and
satirical elements
in his culture, he spends anger in words! He reacts, he
rebels, he storms.
A dozen poems hardly exhaust his gall. It is not merely
that beauty and joy and love are transient, now, but in
their going
they are corrupted into their opposites, -- ugliness,
pain, indifference.
And his anger once stilled by speech, what lassitude
follows!
Life, in this volume, is hardly less evident by its
ecstasy
than by its collapse. It is a book of youth, sensitive,
vigorous, sound;
but it is the fruit of intensity, and bears the traits.
The search for solitude, the relief from crowds, the open
door into nature;
the sense of flight and escape; the repeated thought of
safety,
the insistent fatigue, the cry for sleep; -- all these
bear confession
in their faces. "Flight", "Town and
Country", "The Voice", are eloquent
of what they leave untold; and the climax of
"Retrospect", --
"And I should sleep, and I should sleep," --
or the sestet of "Waikiki", or the whole
fainting sonnet
entitled "A Memory", belong to the nadir of
vitality. At moments
weariness set in like a spiritual tide. I associate, too,
with such moods,
psychologically at least, his visions of the
"arrested moment", as in
"Dining-Room Tea", -- a sort of trance state --
or in the pendant sonnet.
Analogous moods are not infrequent in the great poets.
Rupert Brooke
seems to have faltered, nervously, at times; these poems
mirror faithfully
such moments. But even when the image of life,
imaginative or real,
falters so, how essentially vital it still is, and
clothed in an exquisite
body of words like the traditional "rainbow hues of
the dying fish"!
For I cannot express too strongly my admiration of the
literary sense
of this young poet, and my delight in it. "All these
have been my loves,"
he says, if I may repeat the phrase; but he seems to have
loved the words,
as much as the things, -- "dear names", he
adds. The born man of letters
speaks there. So, when his pulse is at its lowest,
he cannot forget the beautiful surface of his South Sea
idyls
or of versified English gardens and lanes. He cared as
much
for the expression as for the thing, which is what makes
a man of letters.
So fixed is this habit that his art, truly, is
independent
of his bodily state. In his poems of "collapse"
as in those of "ecstasy"
he seems to me equally master of his mood, -- like those
poets who are
"for all time". His literary skill in verse was
ripe, how long so ever
he might have to live.
"All, except only LOVE -- LOVE had died long ago."
The poem is like a vision of an old time MASQUE: --
"The sweet lad RHYME" ----
"ARDOUR, the sunlight on his greying hair" ----
"BEAUTY . . . pale in her black; dry-eyed, she stood alone."
How vivid! The lines owe something to his eye for
costume, for staging;
but, as mere picture writing, it is as firm as if carved
on an obelisk.
And as he reconciled concrete and abstract here, so he
had left
his short breath, in those earlier lines, behind, and had
come into
the long sweep and open water of great style: --
"And light on waving grass, he knows not when,
And feet that ran, but where, he cannot tell."
Or; --
"And feel, who have laid our groping hands away;
And see, no longer blinded by our eyes,"
Or, more briefly, --
"In wise majestic melancholy train."
And this, --
"And evening hush broken by homing wings,"
Such lines as these, apart from their beauty, are in
the best manner
of English poetic style. So, in many minor ways, he
shuffled
contrast and climax, and the like, adept in the handling
of poetic rhetoric that he had come to be; but in three
ways
he was conspicuously successful in his art.
The first of these -- they are all in the larger forms
of art --
is the dramatic sonnet, by which I do not mean merely
a sonnet in dialogue or advancing by simple contrast;
but one in which there may be these things, but also
there is
a tragic reversal or its equivalent. Not to consider it
too curiously,
take "The Hill". This sonnet is beautiful in
action and diction;
its eloquence speeds it on with a lift; the situation is
the very crest of life; then, --
"We shall go down with unreluctant tread,
Rose-crowned into the darkness! . . . Proud we were,
And laughed, that had such brave true things to say.
-- And then you suddenly cried and turned away."
The dramatic sonnet in English has not gone beyond
that, for beauty,
for brevity, for tragic effect, -- nor, I add, for
unspoken loyalty
to reality. Reality was, perhaps, what he most dearly
wished for;
here he achieved it. In many another sonnet he won the
laurel;
but if I were to venture to choose, it is in the dramatic
handling
of the sonnet that he is most individual and
characteristic.
The second great success of his genius, formally
considered,
lay in the narrative idyl, either in the Miltonic way of
flashing bits
of English country landscape before the eye, as in
"Grantchester",
or by applying essentially the same method to the water
world of fishes
or the South Sea world, both on a philosophic background.
These are all master poems of a kaleidoscopic beauty and
charm,
where the brief pictures play in and out of a woven veil
of thought,
irony, mood, with a delightful intellectual pleasuring.
He thoroughly enjoys doing the poetical magic. Such bits
of
English retreats or Pacific paradises, so full of idyllic
charm,
exquisite in image and movement, are among the rarest of
poetic treasures.
The thought of Milton and of Marvell only adds an old
world charm
to the most modern of the works of the Muses. What
lightness of touch,
what ease of movement, what brilliancy of hue! What
vivacity throughout!
Even in "Retrospect", what actuality!
And the third success is what I should call the
"melange". That is,
the method of indiscrimination by which he gathers up
experience,
and pours it out again in language, with full disregard
of its relative values. His good taste saves him from
what in another
would be shipwreck, but this indifference to values, this
apparent lack
of selection in material, while at times it gives a
huddled flow,
more than anything else "modernizes" the verse.
It yields, too,
an effect of abundant vitality, and it makes facile the
change
from grave to gay and the like. The "melange",
as I call it,
is rather an innovation in English verse, and to be found
only rarely.
It exists, however; and especially it was dear to Keats
in his youth.
It is by excellent taste, and by style, that the poet
here overcomes
its early difficulties.
In these three formal ways, besides in minor matters,
it appears to me
that Rupert Brooke, judged by the most orthodox
standards,
had succeeded in poetry.
"voice more sweet than the far plaint of viols is,
Or the soft moan of any grey-eyed lute player."
But these things are arcana.
G. E. W.
Beverly, Mass., October, 1915.
Back to Contents
Back to Rupert Brooke Page
Back to Poetry, etc. Page
Back to Home Page